.jpg)
The Trump economic team is struggling to maintain a coherent narrative. Public statements from Treasury officials, conflicting claims about tariffs, and growing contradictions around tax refunds have exposed deep cracks in their economic strategy. What was once marketed as a bold plan to generate prosperity through tariffs and tax policy is increasingly revealed as a mix of exaggeration, deflection, and damage control.
At the center of this unraveling story are three key institutions: the Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Federal Reserve. When senior figures blur institutional boundaries and repeat misleading claims, markets notice, credibility erodes, and policy consequences follow.
This article breaks down the tariff myth, the tax refund sleight of hand, the Federal Reserve’s internal tension, and the moment a Fed governor unintentionally admitted a truth the Trump team desperately wanted to bury: the economy functioned better before Trump’s current policies took hold.
The Tariff Dividend Myth
Trump’s Core Claim
Trump has repeatedly claimed that tariffs are generating trillions of dollars in revenue for the U.S. government, framing them as a “tariff dividend” that can fund tax relief and economic stimulus without cost to American consumers.
The Reality Behind the Numbers
The data tells a very different story:
-
Tariffs and excise taxes rose from roughly 5% to 9% of gross federal revenue
-
This increase amounted to billions, not trillions
-
During the same period, the federal deficit increased by approximately 10%
Rather than reducing deficits or funding new benefits, tariff revenue failed to keep pace with government spending. Worse, tariffs imposed higher costs on imports, which were passed down to consumers through increased prices.
Why the Tariff Dividend Never Existed
A true tariff dividend would require:
-
Massive surplus revenue
-
Stable or falling consumer prices
-
A shrinking deficit
None of these conditions were met. In fact, had tariff revenue been distributed directly to households, it would have drained the Treasury’s operating funds, making basic government functions unstable.
The Refund Narrative: Rebranding What Already Exists
The Treasury’s New Talking Point
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent began promoting a new idea: large tax refunds, allegedly caused by recent legislation, would inject $100–150 billion into the economy during the first quarter.
He suggested:
-
Refunds of $1,000 to $2,000 per household
-
A demand boost capable of stimulating economic growth
The Problem With the Math
Historical IRS data shows:
-
Average refunds under Biden’s last two years totaled around $290 billion annually
-
The average refund per filer was approximately $3,100
In other words:
-
The proposed refunds are smaller than what Americans already received
-
They are not new stimulus
-
They are not tied to tariff revenue
This narrative attempts to sell routine tax refunds as a bold new economic policy.
Institutional Overlap and Credibility Concerns
Too Many Hats, Too Much Power
Public messaging increasingly portrays Scott Bessent as:
-
Treasury Secretary
-
IRS Commissioner
-
Potential National Economic Council head
This consolidation raises serious concerns:
-
Treasury and IRS independence
-
Political interference in tax administration
-
Erosion of institutional trust
Economic credibility depends on clear boundaries. When those boundaries blur, markets and households alike lose confidence.
The Federal Reserve’s Tightrope Walk
The Role of the Fed
The Federal Reserve exists to:
-
Maintain price stability
-
Promote full employment
-
Remain independent from political pressure
But under Trump’s economic agenda, the Fed has been placed in a policy trap.
Myron’s Rise — And His Slip
Who Is Myron?
Governor Myron has become a central figure within the Fed:
-
A vocal advocate for aggressive rate cuts
-
A dissenter at nearly every policy meeting
-
A believer that the “neutral rate” should be as low as 1.3%
Despite being a potential candidate for Fed Chair, his influence may have peaked.
The Question That Boxed Him In
During a public discussion, Myron was asked whether stimulus checks under the Biden administration contributed to inflation.
His response acknowledged something critical:
-
Post-COVID demand was already recovering naturally
-
Vaccines, reopening, and job growth were restoring economic momentum
-
The economy was strong and improving during Biden’s term
This admission undermined the core Trump narrative that Biden “destroyed” the economy.
What Myron Accidentally Revealed
Though attempting to argue that stimulus may have added inflationary pressure, Myron unintentionally confirmed:
-
Economic recovery was underway before Trump’s return
-
Job growth was consistent and strong
-
Demand was healthy without emergency intervention
The implication was unavoidable: today’s economic weakness is not inherited — it is engineered.
Inflation: What Actually Happened
Breaking Down the Biden Inflation Spike
Independent analysis shows inflation came from multiple sources:
-
30–40% from corporate price hikes exploiting consumer liquidity
-
30% from global supply chain disruptions
-
The remainder from normal post-crisis inflation
Stimulus checks played a role, but corporate pricing power magnified the effect.
Profits Over People
During this period:
-
Corporate profits hit historic highs
-
Wall Street thrived
-
Consumers briefly reduced debt and increased savings
The problem was not stimulus — it was unchecked corporate behavior.
Tariffs and Today’s Inflation
Why Prices Aren’t Falling
Despite:
-
Oil prices below $60 per barrel
-
Cooling demand in several sectors
Prices remain elevated due to:
-
Import costs driven by tariffs
-
A weakened dollar
-
Inflation expectations baked into pricing models
The dollar has lost significant value due to fears of prolonged tariff policy.
The Fed’s Impossible Position
The Fed now faces:
-
Inflation driven by policy, not demand
-
Labor market stress
-
Rising bankruptcies
-
Private credit market instability
Rate cuts alone cannot fix tariff-driven inflation.
Fed Independence Under Threat
Myron has previously authored policy proposals aimed at:
-
Reorganizing the Federal Reserve
-
Increasing executive control
-
Weakening institutional independence
Ironically, this was framed as “depoliticizing” the Fed — while placing it under direct political influence.
Why Lower Rates Still Matter
Despite criticism, lower rates could:
-
Ease credit card debt
-
Reduce commercial loan pressure
-
Stabilize consumer finances
But rate cuts cannot offset the structural damage caused by tariffs.
Biden’s Missed Opportunities
While the economy improved under Biden, key failures remained:
-
Expiration of expanded child tax credits
-
Abandonment of windfall profit taxes
-
Delayed healthcare reforms
-
Underutilized clean energy investment
These failures allowed Trump to reclaim the affordability narrative.
Trump’s Current Economic Reality
The present situation includes:
-
Sticky inflation
-
Job losses
-
Rising bankruptcies
-
Credit market stress
And a policy agenda centered on:
-
Smaller tax refunds
-
Permanent tariffs
-
Legal workarounds if courts intervene
This is not economic innovation — it is entrenchment.
Conclusion: The Quiet Truth Is Now Loud
Even those defending Trump’s economic agenda are struggling to maintain consistency. When a Fed governor admits that recovery was already underway before Trump’s policies, the narrative collapses.
Doing nothing would have been better than what followed.
Tariffs have failed. Refunds are recycled. Inflation persists. And the institutions meant to protect economic stability are being strained to justify political talking points.
The quiet part has been said out loud — and there is no walking it back.